Saturday, February 28, 2026

The Rise of Hybrid-Agile: Why and How CHAMP is Filling the Gap


Nearly two years ago, I wrote this:

“Waterfall is here to stay. Agile is also here to stay. The waterfall or predictive mode of development has been there for quite sometime, and it’s here to stay. Similarly, Agile is also here to stay. Agile is used when there is rapid churn in requirements and high uncertainty in the technology platform being used.”

And I continued:

“As a Certified Hybrid-Agile Master Professional (CHAMP), you will know both waterfall and Agile and you are going to combine them both. This way, you will get the best of both and apply them in real-world projects.”

Since then though the development world has moved fast, the fundamentals have remained the same. Fundamentals, like principles, never change. 

What I do I mean by these fundamentals? 

All organizations exist to create value for their stakeholders – employees, customers, users, shareholders, and others. Organizations can be profit-based, non-profit-based or run by governments. Irrespective of the nature and type of organization, everyone of the them is focussed on (business) value creation. 

The Rigidity of Waterfall 

Traditional waterfall models were designed long before – in the mid-last century. These follow techniques such as:

  • Up-front planning, 
  • Critical path method (was in the 1950s!), 
  • Network diagramming, 
  • Change control with Change Control Boards (CCBs),
  • Strict documentation,
  • Command and control management paradigm etc.

This mode of development is effective in various industries – specifically the regulatory-heavy ones. But these are not much applied where requirements – or the market itself – change rapidly. Agile comes in here. 

The Pitfalls of Agile

There are many Agile team-based approaches such as Scrum, Kanban as well as Scaled Agile approaches such as the CIPSA  framework. All of these are used around the world. Such approaches emphasize collaboration, iterative and/or incremental value delivery and high adaptability. 

But then large organizations or industries don’t always want to follow pure Agile. There are various constraints, which prohibits them to take a full-fledged adaptive route. 

Below are some scenarios, which I’ve come to know while interacting with Hybrid-Agile practitioners:

  • Budget uncertainty: Agile budgeting is mostly just-in-time, though a high-level budget can be there for the releases. See here for Agile Release Planning. 
  • Portfolio Governance: Portfolios stand at the highest-level of management in organization as it drives the organization’s strategic goals and objectives. See here.
  • Industry itself: For example, construction industry, mining industry or film industry still follow the waterfall model, though some elements can be in adaptive mode. 

This brings in Hybrid-Agile.

The Rise of Hybrid-Agile Management with CHAMP

Pure predictive models (like traditional Waterfall) struggle to adapt quickly. Pure Agile models such as Scrum and Kanban excel at team-level delivery but often lack enterprise governance structure.

Purely predictive/waterfall models struggle to adapt quickly. Purely Adaptive models such as Scrum or Kanban excel at team-level delivery, but lacks the enterprise-level governance, its framework and enforcement. In addition, many roles in an organization can't be thrown away just because Agile has to come-in.

This, in turn, creates frictions:

  • Top executives want forecasting, control and predictability.
  • Teams want flexibility, autonomy as well as mastery.
  • Regulators want documentation and in fact, many times very particular about it.
  • Customers want rapid innovation and quick return on investment (ROI).

Hybrid-Agile Management emerged as the practical answer. However, until recently, there was no clear professional path dedicated to mastering it. All certifications in Hybrid-Agile management are theoretical in nature, which helps the least to understand. 

This is where CHAMP steps-in and rises to the occasion.

The Value and Importance of CHAMP

CHAMP (Certified Hybrid-Agile Master Professional) is a credential designed to equip professionals with the capability to design, lead, and manage hybrid-agile environments.

ManagementYogi’s CHAMP focuses on:

  1. Integrating Agile delivery with Waterfall.
  2. Designing and working with a large number of hybrid models.
  3. Learning and applying various hybrid-agile management principles.
  4. Learning all possible ones – Hybrid-Scrum, Hybrid-Kanban, and Hybrid-ScrumBan.
  5. Generating a large of reports for not only communication, but also compliance. 

Rather than positioning Agile and Traditional methods as opposites, ManagementYogi’s CHAMP teaches how to intentionally mix them as per your needs.

CHAMP is especially suited for:

  • Large enterprises undergoing digital transformation, but struggling with pure Agile.
  • Regulated industries where documentation is equally valued and some-times phase-based approach is mandated.
  • Project/Program Management Offices (PMOs) seeking modernization or to shift into Hybrid mode.
  • Organizations caught between Waterfall and Agile approaches as they need both.

Conclusion

As I wrote in the beginning – both Waterfall and Agile are here to stay. The CHAMP credential does not discard one and favors another, but integrates them as many industries require it. Below are some examples.

1 # A bank launching a digital platform must move fast, but also meet regulatory requirements.

2 # A healthcare provider must innovate, but document thoroughly. 

3 # A government program must adapt, but maintain audit trails.

4 # A fintech startup releasing a new mobile payment feature (I've worked in such project in the last decade) must iterate rapidly, but also pass stringent audits.

5 # A telecom company rolling out a new service must respond quickly to customer demands, but also follow regulatory rollout plans.

As you’d have noticed in the all the above cases the former is Adaptive/Agile, whereas the latter is usually Predictive/Waterfall. And as noted earlier, there can be various other Hybrid-Agile models – not just Agile followed with Waterfall.

With CHAMP certification, you learn, nurture, and apply various models with real-world projects. Start learning today and have a deep understanding on Hybrid-Agile management. 

👉 [Enroll Today] Pay via PayPal/Bank transfer. Email: managementyogi@gmail.com. Enroll in 24hrs.


CHAMP Reviews and Success Stories:

ManagementYogi's CHAMP Certification Course:


Saturday, February 07, 2026

Second Trailer: Certified Hybrid-Agile Master Professional (CHAMP) – World's Only Practical Hybrid-Agile Certification


Hybrid-Agile management is complex and demands solid understanding of both traditional and Agile concepts. The Certified Hybrid-Agile Master Professional (C.H.A.M.P or simply CHAMP) course demonstrates and uses real hybrid projects with hands-on software tool. 

Top 10 Reasons to Go for CHAMP Certification

The CHAMP certification course is dynamic, not static. It is continuously updated to reflect the latest trends and practices. [See here.]

Hybrid is everywhere in our daily lives. Consider these examples:

  • When day meets night at dusk, it’s hybrid time.
  • When night meets day at dawn, it’s hybrid time again.
  • When a dancing wave embraces the shore, that zone is hybrid.
  • When the shore blends into the land, we see hybrid once more. 

In the same way, Hybrid-Agile project management mirrors real life. It’s widely adopted across organizations, yet many people only learn the theory and struggle to apply it in practice.

That’s where CHAMP stands apart. Being hands-on and practical, it is radically different—yet as natural as the everyday hybrid moments.

The below trailer (1m: 21s) informs more. For the best experience, go full-screen HD mode and plug-in your headphones.



A brief tabular differentiation between CHAMP and other certifications is shown below. 

To know more about the CHAMP certification course, see here.

To have the complete course breakdown, check here.

For this course, many FAQs have been answered. See here

If you have any other questions or clarifications, please send an email to managementyogi@gmail.com.


CHAMP Reviews and Success Stories:

ManagementYogi's CHAMP Certification Course:


Friday, January 30, 2026

Primavera P6 Pro Live Lessons – Understanding and Applying Crashing and Fast Tracking


There are many ways to compress a schedule. You can add more resources, change the relationship among the activities or tasks, run activities in parallel, reduce the float in certain cases, among others. 

However, two schedule compression techniques are quite popular and they are:

  1. Crashing
  2. Fast Tracking

Crashing, by introducing more resources, increases cost. On the other hand, fast tracking, by ignoring relationships (dependencies), increases risks. Crashing can also increase risks. Fast tracking can increase cost as well! 

In Primavera P6, we can apply both these schedule compression techniques. In this post, we will learn how to use such techniques. If you are aspiring to be a Project Management Professional (PMP®), or Risk Management Professional (RMP®), you’ll quickly understand. Nevertheless, if you are not one, but aspiring to be one, then also you will understand. 

The content of this article is taken from the Primavera P6 Pro Live Lessons course – an exhaustive course covering various functionalities and capabilities Primavera P6 Professional with respect to project management. There, I've used and explained with live P6 projects.

Now, let’s briefly understand the background concepts of these two techniques.

Understanding Crashing

Crashing compresses the schedule by adding more resources. This technique used shortens the schedule duration for the least incremental cost. 

Examples: A real-time example is working overtime. Another real-time example is paying more to deliver faster.

As more resources are added, cost increases. Risk may also increase. Let us take an example. We've 3 activities: 

  • Activity A1, A2 and A3 with one resource assigned. 
  • The activities are sequential, i.e., A3 will follow A1 and A2 will follow A1.
  • The duration for each activity is 2 days. 
  • The total duration is 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 days

Next, we added one more resource for each activity to crash. So, now:

  • Activity A1, A2 and A3 have two resources assigned. 
  • The duration for each activity will be reduced to 1 day.
  • The total duration is 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 days.

With crashing, we reduced the combined duration of three activities from 6 days to 3 days. This is a form of schedule compression. Isn't it?

Understanding Fast Tracking

Fast Tracking compresses the schedule by making the activities parallel instead of sequential. This can happen for a portion of the schedule. 

Examples: Preparing the test plan along with the approval of the Product Requirements documentation. Another real-time example is cooking two items together, but on two separate burners of your stove.

As activities are executed in parallel and original relationships are changed, risk increases. Cost may also increase due to rework. 

Let’s reuse our previous example. We've 3 activities:

  • Activity A1, A2 and A3 with one resource assigned. 
  • The activities are sequential, i.e., A3 will follow A1 (FS relationship) and A2 will follow A1 (FS relationship).
  • FS stands for Finish to Start relationship.
  • The duration for each activity is 2 days. 
  • The total duration is 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 days

Next, we changed the relationships among the activities to Start to Start (SS) or Finish to Finish (FF) in order to fast track. So, now:

  • The activities are parallel, i.e., A3 will start with A2 (FF relationship) and A2 will start with A1 (SS relationship).
  • The duration for each activity remains as 2 days. 
  • But the total duration is now 2 days as all activities are done in parallel.

In this case of fast tracking, we reduced the combined duration of three activities from 6 days to 2 days.

This is another form of schedule compression. 

Primavera P6 – Applying Crashing

Primavera P6 exactly follows our previous explanation of Crashing. Again, we will reuse our example for crashing.

As shown below, we have three activities – A1, A2 and A3, each with one resource. These are done in sequence. (click on the image to enlarge) 

The total duration as shown above is 6 days.

Next, we added more resources – one more resource for each activity. With it the total duration was reduced.  

The total duration now shown above is 2 days. Note that we have added two resources (Res1 and Res2) for each activity.

Hence, we can say with crashing we compressed the schedule. 

Primavera P6 – Applying Fast Tracking

Here too, Primavera P6 follows the previous explanation of Fast Tracking. We will reuse our example for crashing.

As shown below, we have three activities – A1, A2 and A3, each with one resource (Res1). These are done in sequence or have Finish to Start (FS) relationship.  

The total duration as shown above is 6 days with all in FS relationships.

Next, we changed the dependencies among the activities. With it, the total duration was reduced.  

The total duration now shown above is 2 days. Note that the relationships have changed among the activities. 

Hence, we can say that with fast tracking we can also compress the schedule. 

Demonstration and Explanation

The below video [duration: 5m, 15s] explains Crashing and Fast Tracking using Primavera P6. In the Primavera P6 Pro Live Lessons, we will use a live, real-time project to demonstrate both crashing and fast tracking. 

To have a better audio-visual experience, plug-in your earphones and go full-screen HD.


Key Points to Note

Now that you understood, learned and also learned how to apply Crashing and Fast Tracking, following are the key points to note. Detailed explanation with a number of key points is part of the Primavera P6 Pro Live Lessons course.

  • Use crashing for critical activities. Only with the reduction in remaining duration of critical activities, the project schedule will be reduced.
  • Ensure that the duration type, activity types are proper when you apply crashing for the activities. 
  • Also ensure that the Calendars is properly applied to the activities during crashing and/or fast tracking. For example, you are fast tracking two activities, for the concerned resources are not available for the second activity!

It’s important to note that activity type, duration type and calendars etc. will be considered while going for schedule compression.

Finally, be judicious in applying the schedule compression techniques. Running activities in parallel does not mean resources will actually work in parallel on the ground. Understand the limitations.

Nevertheless, both Crashing and Fast Tracking are powerful techniques to be used. As we can learn with this article, they can be effectively applied with Primavera P6. To know, learn and apply like a pro, subscribe to the course of Primavera P6 Live Lessons


References

[1] * NEW * Course – Primavera P6 Pro Live Lessons, with Full Money-Back Guarantee, by ManagementYogi.com 

[2] Article: Primavera P6 - Understanding Various Activity Types, by Satya Narayan Dash

[3] Course: Practical PMP with Oracle Primavera P6, by Satya Narayan Dash

[4] Course: Practical RMP with Oracle Primavera Risk Analysis, by Satya Narayan Dash